Say what you will, but the President has been true to to campaign promises. The problem is, many of those nieve voters who did vote for him thought his promise to change America was something positive. I guess it really depends on your view of what is good for America. If you view
- systemically higher unemployment,
- lower wages and wage growth,
- higher costs of energy,
- higher food costs,
- higher costs of imports due to the deprciating dollar, and
- reduced standard of living for your children and grandchildren
then you should love what Obama’s policies have done. The latest example is the new EPA regulations which we’ll discuss in detail in a later post.
If you recall, during his campaign, he promised to bankrupt the coal industry and raise the cost of everyone’s electricity. As the price of gasoline spiked, he said he didn’t have a problem with the price being over $4.00 per gallon only at that the price spike happened so quickly. Now, he has put into place regulations that will definately raise the price of electricity, which will raise the price of every good, service and product made in the U.S. I think this will further
So, those of you who voted for Obama, I hope you like the change you have put us through. As for me, I’m looking to head back to reality instead of the false land of liberalism that has been tried.
Once again, Walter Williams’Examiner column highlights the ignorance of those in the media and the elistists. It is a must read for everyone.
Why do citizens let those in DC and the media influence their opinion?
Michael Barone has an article in which he articulates a belief I have long held: We weren’t as rich as we thought we were prior to the current depression. The government tried all the tricks in the playbook to reinflate the bubble, the the good old market would have none of that. I submit that had we not tried all of those old tricks and just let the market fix the problems, we would be in a better position today and not another $5 trillion in debt.
We don’t have a liquidity problem. We have a solvency problem. Until the balance sheets of consumers and the federal/state/local governments get trued up, we won’t get out of this mess. Sellling this solution is difficult, especially with the economic illiterates on the Left and their voting block.
News reports have it that Obama authorized a strike against the compound where it was believed that bin Laden was hiding. If the reports turn out to be true, then hats off to Obama for making the call to strike and continuing the hunt for Osama.
Hey, since I agree with Obama on this matter, am I no longer a racist?
The messiah finally released his long-form birth certificate. So, why wait so long?
I always find it amusing in politics that those so vo’ciferously opposed to the policies of the then current administration often make those same choices when faced with similar circumstances.
The only difference is that Bush actually consulted with Congress.
Where’s all the outrage?
Glenn Reynolds has a great Op-Ed in today’s Washington Examiner. His premise is that if you need a lawyer to figure out how to operate in a country’s economic environment, in all likelihood, the country will have limited economic upside. He cites Greece and the number of lawyers per capita and the 19th centry laws still on the books there.
I would extend this further to say this leads to black markets operating outside the legal and tax systems affording the participants therein with no protection from the very laws and regulations of the political establishment. It sets up the classic legal conundrum: how to I get my government/legal system to help me resolve an illegal contract?
If you needed any evidence that those of us who claimed the end game was to get rid of private insurance companies, you now have it. Bernie Sanders was on MSNBC, and the host asked: “Senator, how frustrating is this for you to see the bill tied up in a constitutional argument when the provisions that could have been in place, like the public option and other versions of the legislation that were rejected early on by the Democrat leadership, would not have posed any constitutional difficulties?”
Mr. Sanders responded “One of the ways I want to see it improved is to give states flexibility to provide health care to all people, maintaining very, very high standards but doing it in a more cost effective way. And in the state of Vermont, we are moving forward toward a Medicare for all single-payer system. And I hope very much to be able to get waivers from Congress and the White House in order to allow us to do so. Because I think at the end of the day if you’re gonna provide health care to all of our people in a cost effective way you’re gonna have to get rid of the private health insurance companies and put our money into health care, not profiteering, not administration, not bureaucracy.”
Mr. Sanders, instead of getting rid of, as you call it, profiteering, administration, and bureaucracy, you will instead get a bureaucracy that has no cost constraints, is politicized, is not responsible to anyone, can not be fired, and will reduce the quality of care. The healthcare insurance industry has a profit margin of only 6 percent.
Sorry, but I’ll stick with the private insurers. I can fire one and go to another anytime I want. Can’t do that when the government is in charge.
Edward Glaeser has a column in the NY Times blogs discussing green jobs. This is a surprise? The exporting of manufacturing jobs for established products has been going on for years. Peter Drucker wrote extensively about it in his book Managing for the Future.
We can decide to develop IP or we can decide to manufacture products already developed. I believe there is an advantage to IP, and we should focus on math and engineering to maintain our standing as an economic power.
Maybe the real lesson from he massacre is that we can’t ever legislate safety.
How many laws does it take to keep guns away from criminals and the mentally infirmed? All that you can pass?
While passing laws may make the politicians feel good about doing something, perhaps, they need to resist the urge next time. Remember, there is nothing that can stop the firm resolve of a person. This can be for the good or the bad.
Maybe citizens will begin to understand that legislation does not solve problems, and they will stop looking towards politicians to solve whatever ails them. People, not legislation, solve their own problems.